5 ms·

JetBrains stuff does feel sluggish and occasionally hangs on my 2016 XPS-13 with 8G of ram. It gets the job done, but it's not pleasant. On my new Ryzen 3600 w

JetBrains stuff does feel sluggish and occasionally hangs on my 2016 XPS-13 with 8G of ram. It gets the job done, but it's not pleasant. On my new Ryzen 3600 with 32G of ram it runs smooth. So if you go for JetBrains, I definitely advise not to cheap out on the hardware. Rider on Linux was very good for me, working on C# azure functions.

pjmlp 7y ago
32G?!? Where does one find such employers??? Not to mention how crazy it sounds having 32GB for an IDE. Visual Studio, Netbeans and Eclipse run perfectly fine with 8 GB.
- jmkni 7y ago
  In my current role, I was given a laptop with 8GB. An additional 24GB mysteriously found it's way in there after a couple of days...
- simonh 7y ago
  I had a 32GB dev machine in my last job at a bank. 8GB is barely enough to run a full-on IDE, but if you also need to run wireshark, Geneos, outlook, big-ass excell sheets, several browsers with over a dozen tabs each, a bunch of communications tools, other office apps etc, etc, I'd regularly go above 20GB memory usage. I was working app support really, with a fair bit of dev work as well, so needed to run a ton of different tools.
  - avgDev 7y ago
    I'm not even at a tech company and requested 32GBs, as I sometimes have VS and Android Studio open, running mobile emulators and checking what is going on the API end. You add VMs to the mix and one really needs 32GBs. My company had no issues providing the ram. Plus, it is insanely cheap right now.
- MrGilbert 7y ago
  It depends on your use-case. Add Docker, VM, development database server etc. to the bill, and a 32 GB machine is pretty reasonable for a dev.
- lultimouomo 7y ago
  I am self employed, and invested the lump sum of 800€ (+ screen that I already head) for a reasonably beefy desktop machine. I'm not saying that 32G is the minimum required to run JetBrains IDEs well; I'm saying 8G is not enough and 32G is definitely enough to run it alongside a bunch of containers and other stuff. I agree that JetBrains stuff is resource hungry (maybe excessively so); to me it is still worth using it for Java, C#, Python, iOS and Android. For C++ I prefer Qt Creator (though I must say that the idea of switching to CLion and having a consistent IDE experience across all platforms that I work on is tempting).
- rafaelvasco 7y ago
  These days 32G is starting to become more of a necessity as apps take more and more RAM. And if you're a gaming, 8G doesn't cut it anymore for some games;
- stoobs 7y ago
  All the Dev machines where I work have been 16GB for years, I wouldn't be surprised if we jumped to 32GB in the next hardware refresh.

pjmlp 7y ago

32G?!? Where does one find such employers??? Not to mention how crazy it sounds having 32GB for an IDE. Visual Studio, Netbeans and Eclipse run perfectly fine with 8 GB.

jmkni 7y ago
In my current role, I was given a laptop with 8GB. An additional 24GB mysteriously found it's way in there after a couple of days...
simonh 7y ago
I had a 32GB dev machine in my last job at a bank. 8GB is barely enough to run a full-on IDE, but if you also need to run wireshark, Geneos, outlook, big-ass excell sheets, several browsers with over a dozen tabs each, a bunch of communications tools, other office apps etc, etc, I'd regularly go above 20GB memory usage. I was working app support really, with a fair bit of dev work as well, so needed to run a ton of different tools.
- avgDev 7y ago
  I'm not even at a tech company and requested 32GBs, as I sometimes have VS and Android Studio open, running mobile emulators and checking what is going on the API end. You add VMs to the mix and one really needs 32GBs. My company had no issues providing the ram. Plus, it is insanely cheap right now.
MrGilbert 7y ago
It depends on your use-case. Add Docker, VM, development database server etc. to the bill, and a 32 GB machine is pretty reasonable for a dev.
lultimouomo 7y ago
I am self employed, and invested the lump sum of 800€ (+ screen that I already head) for a reasonably beefy desktop machine. I'm not saying that 32G is the minimum required to run JetBrains IDEs well; I'm saying 8G is not enough and 32G is definitely enough to run it alongside a bunch of containers and other stuff. I agree that JetBrains stuff is resource hungry (maybe excessively so); to me it is still worth using it for Java, C#, Python, iOS and Android. For C++ I prefer Qt Creator (though I must say that the idea of switching to CLion and having a consistent IDE experience across all platforms that I work on is tempting).
rafaelvasco 7y ago
These days 32G is starting to become more of a necessity as apps take more and more RAM. And if you're a gaming, 8G doesn't cut it anymore for some games;
stoobs 7y ago
All the Dev machines where I work have been 16GB for years, I wouldn't be surprised if we jumped to 32GB in the next hardware refresh.