2 ms·
It's definitely problematic, but so is having your interpreter completely redefine language constructs on every point release. Or having different interpreter i
by otabdeveloper4 7y ago
It's definitely problematic, but so is having your interpreter completely redefine language constructs on every point release. Or having different interpreter implementations act differently because there's no standard.
Somehow we make do in these cases and don't act like the sky is falling.
- kbenson 7y ago> Somehow we make do in these cases and don't act like the sky is falling. I think "there's enough edge cases and undefined behavior in the language that I take it as a fairly bold claim unless it's also been thoroughly reviewed for any places some undefined behavior may be induced" was me acting like the sky is falling. I think that's a very sane push back against a claim that I think either wasn't well founded or wasn't well explained. Ultimately it's up to you to decide whether to accept I'm expressing what my words actually say or whether I'm expressing what you presented me as in your straw man argument you originally replied with. At this point, there's not much else I can or am willing to waste any more time saying that I haven't already.