1)N Yeah - this assumes the safe browsing list is under control of the attacker. They could ensure that https://free-hk.org/ https://free-hk.org/ and https://fr

1)N Yeah - this assumes the safe browsing list is under control of the attacker. They could ensure that https://free-hk.org/ https://free-hk.org/ and https://free-hk.org/about https://free-hk.org/about and https://free-hk.org/blog https://free-hk.org/blog and https://free-hk.org/news https://free-hk.org/news and https://free-hk.org/donate https://free-hk.org/donate and https://free-hk.org/next-protest https://free-hk.org/next-protest are all "on the list". 2) Right. I was imagining some sort of binary search through the hash space - which might be way off base. It might actually take all 10,000 pages to guarantee it? That seems wronger in my head than binary search? 3) I don't think that matters so much, the order or sequences don't matter, only a cluster of visits within a chosen timeframe. I don't mind if you browse to https://bank.tld/ https://bank.tld/ in between https://free-hk.org/news https://free-hk.org/news and https://free-hk.org/next-protest.. https://free-hk.org/next-protest...