4 ms·
This is spot on, and I'm going to call it for what it is. Just another way of Google creeping on user data to improve their products. The same way they do with
by aclsid 7y ago
This is spot on, and I'm going to call it for what it is. Just another way of Google creeping on user data to improve their products. The same way they do with fonts, email, ads, etc etc etc.
I for one I'm appalled that nobody really cares too much about this because of the covenience provided by Google tools, but we clearly have a situation building up where another RMS will come up with the equivalent of the free software foundation but from a privacy perspective.
- lordlimecat 7y ago> I'm going to call it for what it is. Just another way of Google creeping on user data to improve their products. You called it spot on and then came to a conclusion that fundamentally disagrees with the article: * This is Apple and Tencent, not Google * The author does not believe that Safe Search (Update API) is a way for Google to spy; or if it is, its privacy risk is marginal compared to the huge security win * The author's beef is not at all with this functionality, but in how it was communicated