> This should be a fairly simple calculation: coal kills a lot more people than nuclear. That is a good argument against coal. Why not trying to develop better

> This should be a fairly simple calculation: coal kills a lot more people than nuclear. That is a good argument against coal. Why not trying to develop better solutions? That is, including nuclear. The nuclear solution as it stands is obsolete, by the industry's standards, expensive and doesn't make much sense. The next-generation is not ready—more effort needed there. Alternative solutions exist that are both safer and economically sound.