3 ms·

> Which version of gnome are you on? 3.24 I think? whatever the ubuntu beta is using. > I just checked gnome settings and it has option to change touchpad spe

> Which version of gnome are you on? 3.24 I think? whatever the ubuntu beta is using. > I just checked gnome settings and it has option to change touchpad speed. Don't have a mouse so can't comment for that but it should be there. I can assure you it is not edit to add issue link: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/379 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/3... > Open the app and right click the app icon in dock(if that is what you mean by favorites bar) and it should have an option to add to favorites. neat! that didn't work for kitty though, for example, I had to do it manually. > I have found gnome to have the easiest way to edit all shortcuts. Settings>Devices>Keyboard should show you all the keyboard shortcuts and if you scroll to bottom you will find option to add custom shortcuts which you can set to any command. Much more extensive than the frustrating MacOS keyboard shortcuts in my opinion. The shortcuts panel is indeed very nice, and the shortcuts that you can change there are nice. However, many aren't changeable there, and you have to install (!) and go to the very poorly designed keyboard modifications panel of gnome-tweaks, for example, to change caps lock to esc and tell gnome what you want your windows/mac key to do. Where it falls down from karabiner is: 1. there's no way to have different settings for different keyboards. I have two that I use regularly, with fairly different layouts 2. it lacks the power of karabiner; I'd love to have a rule like "command-c equals ctrl-shift-c but command-t equals ctrl-t". Trivial in karabiner, impossible in gnome > all you then have to do is click install while on the website I'm glad they have that, but I don't want to give my browser that security hole, so I grant you that one's a bit on me. Should be easier to do a manual installation anyway. > I agree linux was in a pretty bad shape a decade ago and we still need to improve a lot but to say it is still the same is ignoring all the hardwork of a large number of wonderful people who have been contributing to the codebase. I do not at all mean to trash the hard work people have done, I really (truly!) respect it. However, from this particular user's perspective, the problems are about equal to what they were a decade ago.

torbjorn 7y ago
Try "kmonad" for a Linux karabiner replacement. You'll need to follow some instructions on the GitHub readme but it can do what you want to do.
- llimllib 7y ago
  thanks! will do
llimllib 7y ago
The thread of responses from the Wayland issue tracker about why "allowing the user to change the scroll speed" is an impossible problem to solve is truly depressing: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/issues/87 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/issues/87
- jandrese 7y ago
  I don't know why it would be a Weyland or X issue. Scroll speed should be controlled by the widgets, GTK in the case of GNOME. Trying to set it at the compositor level seems misguided.
  - paulddraper 7y ago
    Haven't used Weyland, but X is far more than "a compositor." Keyboard, mouse, touchscreen, etc.
    - jandrese 7y ago
      X stops at a very low level. Scroll Wheel events in X are treated as button presses. There's no X API call to get a "scroll by this much" per Button4 or Button5 events. It wouldn't even make sense in the context. All of that is handled by libraries above the X level.
harshitaneja 7y ago
I am on Gnome 3.32.2. I remembered Ubuntu lagged behind but didn't know this much. Maybe the touchpad speed is added in later versions of gnome. Your keyboard shortcut use case is much more complex than mine and I haven't used Karabiner(though I should try because until now I am hating my mac experience and I am stuck with a mac as a daily driver for the past month). It should be possible to use multiple keyboards with different layouts and shortcuts as a colleague of mine used to use his build this way. I have always been on the road so don't have the luxury. https://superuser.com/questions/351936/separate-keyboard-for-shortcuts-on-linux-two-keyboards-two-layouts https://superuser.com/questions/351936/separate-keyboard-for... I don't use kitty but use alacritty and there is an option for changing the copy and paste shortcuts. So you can use command+c for copy. Also for your original query about command-c ctrl-shift-c have you tried setting it up as a macro? Maybe that would work. > I'm glad they have that, but I don't want to give my browser that security hole, so I grant you that one's a bit on me. Should be easier to do a manual installation anyway. I worry about this as well. I used to use this but later realised that I don't need new extensions and just use my existing list so I made a script for this which has been serving me well for some time now. Though with my shift to i3 my gnome use is quite limited for a few years now so can't say if it would hold for routine use case. > I do not at all mean to trash the hard work people have done, I really (truly!) respect it. However, from this particular user's perspective, the problems are about equal to what they were a decade ago. Agreed. A long road to travel.
- llimllib 7y ago
  whoops, 3.34.1 is the version I'm on, I just misremembered.
ernst_klim 7y ago
> I can assure you it is not I have it on vanilla Gnome 3.34 https://imgur.com/BldCTMf https://imgur.com/BldCTMf

torbjorn 7y ago

Try "kmonad" for a Linux karabiner replacement. You'll need to follow some instructions on the GitHub readme but it can do what you want to do.

llimllib 7y ago
thanks! will do

llimllib 7y ago

The thread of responses from the Wayland issue tracker about why "allowing the user to change the scroll speed" is an impossible problem to solve is truly depressing: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/issues/87 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/issues/87

jandrese 7y ago
I don't know why it would be a Weyland or X issue. Scroll speed should be controlled by the widgets, GTK in the case of GNOME. Trying to set it at the compositor level seems misguided.
- paulddraper 7y ago
  Haven't used Weyland, but X is far more than "a compositor." Keyboard, mouse, touchscreen, etc.
  - jandrese 7y ago
    X stops at a very low level. Scroll Wheel events in X are treated as button presses. There's no X API call to get a "scroll by this much" per Button4 or Button5 events. It wouldn't even make sense in the context. All of that is handled by libraries above the X level.

harshitaneja 7y ago

I am on Gnome 3.32.2. I remembered Ubuntu lagged behind but didn't know this much. Maybe the touchpad speed is added in later versions of gnome. Your keyboard shortcut use case is much more complex than mine and I haven't used Karabiner(though I should try because until now I am hating my mac experience and I am stuck with a mac as a daily driver for the past month). It should be possible to use multiple keyboards with different layouts and shortcuts as a colleague of mine used to use his build this way. I have always been on the road so don't have the luxury. https://superuser.com/questions/351936/separate-keyboard-for-shortcuts-on-linux-two-keyboards-two-layouts https://superuser.com/questions/351936/separate-keyboard-for... I don't use kitty but use alacritty and there is an option for changing the copy and paste shortcuts. So you can use command+c for copy. Also for your original query about command-c ctrl-shift-c have you tried setting it up as a macro? Maybe that would work. > I'm glad they have that, but I don't want to give my browser that security hole, so I grant you that one's a bit on me. Should be easier to do a manual installation anyway. I worry about this as well. I used to use this but later realised that I don't need new extensions and just use my existing list so I made a script for this which has been serving me well for some time now. Though with my shift to i3 my gnome use is quite limited for a few years now so can't say if it would hold for routine use case. > I do not at all mean to trash the hard work people have done, I really (truly!) respect it. However, from this particular user's perspective, the problems are about equal to what they were a decade ago. Agreed. A long road to travel.

llimllib 7y ago
whoops, 3.34.1 is the version I'm on, I just misremembered.

ernst_klim 7y ago

> I can assure you it is not I have it on vanilla Gnome 3.34 https://imgur.com/BldCTMf https://imgur.com/BldCTMf