4 ms·
NYC is probably not a good example to use here. Its median property prices are negative this year and flat for two years before that. It's likely (IMHO) that th
by tomweingarten 7y ago
NYC is probably not a good example to use here. Its median property prices are negative this year and flat for two years before that. It's likely (IMHO) that the post-recession building boom is a factor.
https://streeteasy.com/blog/data-dashboard/?agg=Median&metric=Asking%20Price&type=Sales&bedrooms=Any%20Bedrooms&property=Any%20Property%20Type&minDate=2010-01-01&maxDate=2019-08-01&area=Flatiron,Brooklyn%20Heights https://streeteasy.com/blog/data-dashboard/?agg=Median&metri...
- Wowfunhappy 7y agoIt's a perfect example for exactly that reason. NYC is expensive, but not as expensive as cities like San Francisco, precisely because we have more apartments here. We should be building significantly more, but this shows the continuum. Tokyo > New York City > San Francisco
- shuckles 7y agoSF has built more units of housing per capita than NYC for seven of the last ten years that I have data for.
- Wowfunhappy 7y agoThat’s interesting—I hadn’t seen that! It’s really more a question of absolute supply, though. NYC is a lot more dense than SF.
- shuckles 7y agoAnother difference to consider is the superior transit infrastructure which allows for a much larger viable region to live in if you work in Manhattan, versus San Francisco within the Bay Area.