5 ms·
In my area (in the 80s/90s I think) we had to pay extra for touch tone service. Anyone know if there was a technical reason for that originally? A quick searc
by larntz 7y ago
In my area (in the 80s/90s I think) we had to pay extra for touch tone service.
Anyone know if there was a technical reason for that originally?
A quick search shows that apparently these charges were still around until recently. Maybe it was just another reason for the telco to add a fee to the bill?
- jones1618 7y agoAll the fees were kind of B.S. especially as technology made providing the switching, call-forwarding and caller ID ring services easier and cheaper to provide. Besides, remember that they used to charge _rent_ for your phone and wouldn't allow 3rd party phones at all until the late 60's or so.
- myself248 7y agoOriginally, the switching equipment was driven with pulses, and your phone interacted with it directly. As the dial plans got more elaborate, things like digit absorbers got in between you and the actual call routing equipment, but they all still talked to each other and to you with pulses. When tone dialing made its debut, some offices had switched over to electronic control and could natively understand touch-tone, but a lot had not, so there were front-end circuits that would decode the tones and control the switching equipment. Throughout the 80s, pretty much all the step, panel, and crossbar switches were replaced with common-control switches (where a computer did the thinking, even if relays were still used for the actual routing), and the fees became bogus. If you had Call Waiting, you should not have been paying extra for touch-tone.