4 ms·
Yes, the article is not very well written, in that it blends factual statements about the new laws together with their own opinions, e.g. 'For that reason, the
by joosters 7y ago
Yes, the article is not very well written, in that it blends factual statements about the new laws together with their own opinions,
e.g. 'For that reason, the Chinese Cybersecurity Bureau does not plan to politely make a formal request for the information. The fundamental premise of the new cybersecurity systems is that the government will use its control of communications to simply take the information without discussing the matter with the user.'
Does the author have some magical view into the Chinese Cybersecurity Bureau? Is he making this broad statement based upon something that the CSB has said? Or is it just his viewpoint?
Much more likely is, as you state, when the government wants something, they are going to come along and demand it. And if you want to keep doing business in China, you will have to provide that data.
This, while still a worrying state of affairs, is a far different scenario from 'all crypto is banned!' espoused by the writer.
- Thrwtz 7y agoRefer to the follow up blog post where he goes into detail, including the actual law if you can read Chinese.
- joosters 7y agoPerhaps you could quote the relevant part that shows that this is more than just an opinion of the writer? Given that it is a fundamental theme of the original article (encryption effectively banned), why doesn't the author provide this information in the very same article?