> “It could have been in completely useless purely technical terms "stable"...” Not for nothing, how is this dismissal of terms helping forward understanding?

> “It could have been in completely useless purely technical terms "stable"...” Not for nothing, how is this dismissal of terms helping forward understanding? This is in part a technical discussion with intelligent individuals. If avionics takes ‘stable’ to have a special meaning, then denying the term’s special meaning undermines credibility of those who are working so hard to hold Boeing to account.