> But I really don't see why I would take Brian Eno's ideas on why we need nuclear power... This was my initial reaction also. On any story about 'nuclear pow

> But I really don't see why I would take Brian Eno's ideas on why we need nuclear power... This was my initial reaction also. On any story about 'nuclear power' I tend to search for fission and fusion, just to see if the author is sufficiently informed / concise. I'm starting to dismiss any article that doesn't qualify this basic difference. I'm happy to see money poured into fusion R&D, but not happy to advocate more fission reactors being constructed -- and the appellations pro/anti-nuclear simply doesn't describe that not uncommonly held position.