You’re looking at the method name after the compiler got done mangling type information into it for the linker. The human-readable name that (what appears to be

You’re looking at the method name after the compiler got done mangling type information into it for the linker. The human-readable name that (what appears to be an anonymous block) likely appears within in the source code appears to be “shouldConsultWithTencent” in a namespace (class?) “Backend::Google::SSBUtilities”. The other line noise encodes return and argument types via the process of Name Mangling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling