4 ms·
That's true, or at least the SEC doesn't seem likely to go after Ethereum. It's hard to say for sure what exactly the difference is. It seems like the SEC is i
by lacker 7y ago
That's true, or at least the SEC doesn't seem likely to go after Ethereum. It's hard to say for sure what exactly the difference is.
It seems like the SEC is intentionally not being clear about what they find acceptable and what they find unacceptable. I don't know whether this is because they are just slow about things, or whether they want to keep their options open because why not, or what.
It would be nice to have crisp, clear rules about how to create a new token that is considered a commodity in the US.
- nullc 7y agoOr because there is potentially a conflict of interests? It's not too hard to imagine that SEC staffers have an interest in some of the things they're not going after and don't have an interest in things that they are. In particular, it sure seems to me that surprises in SEC enforcement seem oddly correlated with the offerings that I know were really liberal in handing out premined coins to 'advisors'.