4 ms·
>It allows extraction of natural gas, which will have to be part of our energy mix for the foreseeable future. Natural gas plants not only emit less CO2 than th
by SilasX 7y ago
>It allows extraction of natural gas, which will have to be part of our energy mix for the foreseeable future. Natural gas plants not only emit less CO2 than the coal plants they replace, but can serve as peaker plants to back up renewables.
Yes, but you kinda defeat the environmental/GHG purpose when you leak out (unburned) methane, which is an even worse GHG than CO2.
Methane isn’t good for reducing GHG emissions when the act of extracting it releases something much worse!
(Though of course an exact CBA depends on tabulating the relative amount of methane released per usable unit extracted, and its relative effectiveness as GHG ... to say nothing of the other harms of fracking.)
- ThomPete 7y agoMethane is logarithmic though. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/11/methane-the-irrelevant-greenhouse-gas/ https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/11/methane-the-irrelevan...