3 ms·

I'm somewhat surprised there's zero articles about the latest supposed P?=NP proof by Romanov. Not that I believe it to be correct, but I would expect some peop

• archgoon 16y ago
  Not really. Why should you 'casually' review it? It still takes about as much time and effort to 'casually' review something and come to a conclusion about it that you're willing to write about and stamp your name on, as it does to do it 'properly'. Here's a post by Scott Aaronson from the last time something like this happened. http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=456 http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=456