4 ms·

OS updates are a risk regardless of the platform you're using. You run the risk of breaking something, and Catalina is in particular probably going to break com

by least 7y ago

OS updates are a risk regardless of the platform you're using. You run the risk of breaking something, and Catalina is in particular probably going to break compatibility with something. Just last year with Windows 1809 there was a bug that deleted users' files. If the features don't aren't worth it to your or you're unwilling to back up your data, then you don't need to update it. It's not forced on you. Security patches will still be pushed to Mojave at least until the next major version. I just find it remarkable that you create a dichotomy of either people 'who actually use their computer' or see their computer as a 'fashion accessory.' That's simply not true and is a bad take.

catalogia 7y ago
I find my dichotomy a lot less remarkable than "the problems with Macs are only an issue for programmers." Any user who types lots of emails could be suffering but complaints about the circumstance are frequently dismissed on HN with comments to the effect of: "you're a programmer and therefore weird; your needs are weird and therefore your complaints are irrelevant." (Also, comparing anything favorably to windows should be considered damning with faint praise. Windows is notorious for being trash.)
- least 7y ago
  I never made that claim that you're suggesting. What I did imply was that the term 'power user' is broad and just because apple's PCs don't work for a specific individual's use case, it doesn't mean that they're not for power users. It simply means that Apple fails to meet that person's needs. A data scientist reliant on CUDA cores on nvidia hardware won't find a mac very useful because there aren't any current apple computers that have an nvidia card in it. Still, a musician or film editor might find a great workflow with mac hardware.
  - catalogia 7y ago
    I don't give a damn about CUDA. I'm talking about shoddy hardware and first party applications. None of this is programmer-specific. The decline of Apple product quality effects a broad class of users. The term "power user", used originally upthread, is contrasted with "starbucks crowd", e.g. people who stare pensively at their computer without actually touching it, trying to look cultured and sophisticated with their luxury computer. It's not about programmers or any programming specific tasks. Power user in this context is very broad.
    - least 7y ago
      ...and I'm saying that you're making up an idea in your head that there are people that buy their mac laptops and don't actually use them. The people at Starbucks do use their computers, just not in a way that you appreciate. That meme is propagated online but it doesn't actually reflect reality.
puranjay 7y ago
Shouldn't these Windows-like update issues NOT be happening in Apple since it's a closed system? Apple knows exactly what hardware their shiny new OS will run on. The premium you pay for Apple used to be precisely to safeguard against these OS screwups. I still think Apple makes some great hardware. But the massive premium isn't really worth the trouble anymore.
- least 7y ago
  It shouldn't happen, but it's software development. You know that it will happen.

by least 7y ago

catalogia 7y ago

I find my dichotomy a lot less remarkable than "the problems with Macs are only an issue for programmers." Any user who types lots of emails could be suffering but complaints about the circumstance are frequently dismissed on HN with comments to the effect of: "you're a programmer and therefore weird; your needs are weird and therefore your complaints are irrelevant." (Also, comparing anything favorably to windows should be considered damning with faint praise. Windows is notorious for being trash.)

least 7y ago
I never made that claim that you're suggesting. What I did imply was that the term 'power user' is broad and just because apple's PCs don't work for a specific individual's use case, it doesn't mean that they're not for power users. It simply means that Apple fails to meet that person's needs. A data scientist reliant on CUDA cores on nvidia hardware won't find a mac very useful because there aren't any current apple computers that have an nvidia card in it. Still, a musician or film editor might find a great workflow with mac hardware.
- catalogia 7y ago
  I don't give a damn about CUDA. I'm talking about shoddy hardware and first party applications. None of this is programmer-specific. The decline of Apple product quality effects a broad class of users. The term "power user", used originally upthread, is contrasted with "starbucks crowd", e.g. people who stare pensively at their computer without actually touching it, trying to look cultured and sophisticated with their luxury computer. It's not about programmers or any programming specific tasks. Power user in this context is very broad.
  - least 7y ago
    ...and I'm saying that you're making up an idea in your head that there are people that buy their mac laptops and don't actually use them. The people at Starbucks do use their computers, just not in a way that you appreciate. That meme is propagated online but it doesn't actually reflect reality.

puranjay 7y ago

Shouldn't these Windows-like update issues NOT be happening in Apple since it's a closed system? Apple knows exactly what hardware their shiny new OS will run on. The premium you pay for Apple used to be precisely to safeguard against these OS screwups. I still think Apple makes some great hardware. But the massive premium isn't really worth the trouble anymore.

least 7y ago
It shouldn't happen, but it's software development. You know that it will happen.