3 ms·
Thanks for responding, Steve. I understand that “ownership” implies the right to destroy in any language. The bit I’m not so clear about is whether or not there
by weberc2 7y ago
Thanks for responding, Steve. I understand that “ownership” implies the right to destroy in any language. The bit I’m not so clear about is whether or not there are other rights/responsibilities (such as the right to mutate) as the OP suggests and whether a definition that includes those rights/responsibilities can meaningfully apply to any language or just Rust.
- steveklabnik 7y agoI think they’re talking about the borrow checker, which is technically distinct from ownership.