3 ms·
> I wonder if it's been on purpose or just, as always, their automatic algorithms being imposible to contest when they're wrong. Further down the github issue,
by tomxor 7y ago
> I wonder if it's been on purpose or just, as always, their automatic algorithms being imposible to contest when they're wrong.
Further down the github issue, another person attempts to submit the same build recieving the same response. But then asks for clarification on the applicability to uBlock only to receive an excerpt from ToC bundling advice...
Pretty sure this is not algorithmic. As the dev said they are being stone walled.
- unicornfinder 7y agoIndeed. A friend of mine used to work on YouTube's moderation team. Turns out a lot of the "algorithm" is actually humans, hiding behind the shield of automation.
- behnamoh 7y agoThis scares me a little as "it was algorithm's fault" seems to be a good excuse for tech companies to get away with their monopolistic behavior. A few years down the road and they'll blame "AI" for the misconduct.
- pg_is_a_butt 7y agoA few years down the road we'll all be living without electricity in war-torn hellscape thanks to the "AI" launching nuclear EMPs everywhere.
- YeGoblynQueenne 7y agoDo you mean this post? https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/745#issuecomment-539962215 https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/745#iss... That's the developer relenting and trying to resubmit, after fuming at one of their users suggesting to do so. The reply they get is the same as the original reply, including the ToS (right? Not "ToC") but excluding the bit about risking being banned if the same vilation occurs multiple times. It still looks like an automated reply though.