4 ms·
> I don't think Phoenix will ever be able to do better than about 80% of Rails's productivity. I haven't used Elixir/Phoenix myself, but my main issue with Rub
by krn 7y ago
> I don't think Phoenix will ever be able to do better than about 80% of Rails's productivity.
I haven't used Elixir/Phoenix myself, but my main issue with Ruby on Rails was how much of long-term productivity was sacrificed for short-term productivity gains.
In other words, what made it extremely easy to create the first version of the application with Rails, also made it very hard to maintain and scale it later on.
Therefore, I would consider it a win, if 20% decrease in short-term productivity provided an equal increase in long-term productivity, which is much harder to measure.
- Lio 7y agoI think you’ll have to spell out specifically what those things are that affect long term productivity if you’re going to use them as a argument against use of Rails. I not saying your wrong, just that a hand wavy “rails is bad in the long term” is not an argument.