I've been doing this a long time but someone making an unironic claim that phrenology supports their argument is a new one, honestly. Other than that this is a

I've been doing this a long time but someone making an unironic claim that phrenology supports their argument is a new one, honestly. Other than that this is all over the place. You go back and forth between conflating "genetics" (which in this case seems to just be a proxy for "what someone looks like") and "culture" throughout. This is incoherent at best and I repeat: everyone knows what you're doing. Arguments rather than aspersions? That's yet another boring rhetorical tactic to avoid dealing directly with the accusation that you're all but directly quoting the white supremacist terrorist David Lane. Whatever, tl;dr: people are a majority the product of their conditions and its usually people who don't understand this that end up doing actual genocide.