So, it's safe to assume that you have no evidence? The article itself links to another article they wrote on the usage of groundwater from mega farms. I don't

So, it's safe to assume that you have no evidence? The article itself links to another article they wrote on the usage of groundwater from mega farms. I don't know the answers to your questions because I don't track those things. I do have the ability to search Google and prove your initial claim wrong (before you moved the goalposts). - Here's an article from 4 days ago about an unrelated project [1] - And one from 3 days ago on a different project [2] - Here's a different article from today about another project[3] - One from last week in a different state [4] [1] http://www.chroniclenewspaper.com/news/local-news/county-attorney-says-greens-of-chester-has-water-permit-BB560120 http://www.chroniclenewspaper.com/news/local-news/county-att... [2] https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/401-water-quality-certification-26357/ https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/401-water-quality-certific... [3] https://www.enr.com/blogs/12-california-views/post/47743-california-supreme-court-rejects-environmental-challenges-to-monterey-water-project https://www.enr.com/blogs/12-california-views/post/47743-cal... [4] https://www.duncanbanner.com/oklahoma/news/gravel-mining-permit-application-prompts-concerns/article_60a243b5-4fa4-544c-95cc-efa981b36759.html https://www.duncanbanner.com/oklahoma/news/gravel-mining-per...