3 ms·
> It misidentified 26 (I think) state politicians as existing criminals. What do you mean "mis"? It correctly identified politicians as criminals. In that, thi
by dmitrygr 7y ago
> It misidentified 26 (I think) state politicians as existing criminals.
What do you mean "mis"? It correctly identified politicians as criminals. In that, this AI showed itself to be lightyears ahead of the electorate in terms of understanding how politics works.
- bilbo0s 7y agoI understand you're just joking, but either way you look at it, the AI failed. Either the politicians are criminals, and this tool was only able to correctly categorize 26 of them. Or the politicians are not criminals, and this tool erroneously categorized 26 of them as such. And that's based only on what we know. The experiment may have given rise in state leaders to more fundamental objections. Consider, what if the 26 misidentified politicians, were largely black or hispanic males? We just need to know more about what's been happening in all the testing to say whether these systems are useful or not. That's all I'm saying.
- Rebelgecko 7y agoThe politicians didn't have criminal records, but were being matched with the faces of unrelated people that had been convicted of crimes
- GhettoMaestro 7y agoLol absolutely based.