3 ms·

Is this figure for an infrastructure that requires failover capability (potentially remotely) and does it assume 100% utilization of the bare metal? That seems

Is this figure for an infrastructure that requires failover capability (potentially remotely) and does it assume 100% utilization of the bare metal? That seems crazy high, but I'd also believe it.

bifrost 7y ago
No, with failover capacity it'd only be 4x and its def not assuming 100% utilization. Sadly, its not crazy high.