3 ms·
I don't think the name change was the problem here, rather it wasn't complete until recently.
by 7thaccount 7y ago
I don't think the name change was the problem here, rather it wasn't complete until recently.
- lilSebastian 7y agoSee the section about waiting for perl 6 before doing more work... http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2019/08/is-perl-6-being-renamed.html http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2019/08/is-perl-6-being-ren...
- rz2k 7y ago"a fantastic language to slice, clean up, and extract information from text files, and it was already very widely used in bioinformatics" is a description of Perl 5, not Perl 6. Even if Perl 6 is completed, I don't think it is a practical workhorse for many real world situations. To me being able to create grammars in Perl 6 to parse text data sounds really compelling. However, every time I have played around with them, Perl 6 has been so slow, that I have reverted to using regular expressions in another language.
- kbenson 7y agoI'm pretty sure GP is referring to Perl 5, not the newly renamed Raku. Perl 5 had a lot of use in bioinformatics, and to my knowledge lasted quite a while after the general Perl exodus, until eventually being replaced by biopython. If the confusion regarding Perl 5/6 never happened, it might have retained that popularity in that domain.
- raldi 7y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect