I agree that dynamism can be helpful for prototyping and rush-job applications, but I'd rather "dynamic relational" be implemented for such: https://stackoverfl

I agree that dynamism can be helpful for prototyping and rush-job applications, but I'd rather "dynamic relational" be implemented for such: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66385/dynamic-database-schema#46202802 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66385/dynamic-database-s... One can gradually add constraints to give it RDBMS-like strictness as the project matures. And you can use SQL on it, with minor modifications to assist in comparing dynamic (implied) types.