3 ms·

Heh, no. The header really is "HTTP_REFERER", and is somewhat notorious for the misspelling.

• dauphin 16y ago
  Open an English dictionary (the Oxford one if you're serious), and come back. Note my fault if tbl didn't know how to speak English corectly backed then.
  • jarek 16y ago
    Surely whether or not the RFC's authors know how to spell a word has no bearing on how sensible it is to correct the spelling of "HTTP_REFERER"? I mean, if dools had said "HTTP referer" then you might have had a point, but "HTTP_REFERER" unambiguously refers to the name of the header field.
    • ezalor 16y ago
      No need to be pedant dude.
      • jarek 16y ago
        At the risk of taking the joke too far, "pedant" is a noun and requires an article preceding it.