The patent office has approved all sorts of weird patents including some that violate known physics, and some of those by this same author. I agree it'd be nic

The patent office has approved all sorts of weird patents including some that violate known physics, and some of those by this same author. I agree it'd be nice to see commentary from a non-anonymous fusion researcher. But it's possible to be skeptical of vague claims from people who've "invented" both working fusion and inertia manipulation, without thinking fusion is fairy technology. There are lots of fusion projects with real experiments and clear publicly-known details on their physical principles. Here are some: ITER (the big dog, a giant tokamak) Wendelstein 7-X (stellerator) Tokamak Energy (high field tokamak) Commonwealth (same, from MIT) First Light Fusion (inertial confinement with fast projectile) HB11 Energy (petawatt picosecond laser for boron fusion) TAE (formerly Tri Alpha, boron fusion with magnetic confinement) Helion (deuterium/he3 fusion, with funding from YCombinator) General Fusion (compression by acoustic shockwave from steam-driven pistons) LPP's focus fusion (uses a plasma configuration that collapses itself into high compression) Sandia's Z-pinch ZAP Energy (a private z-pinch effort)