2 ms·
It does not appear to be related. As a side note calling the US Spygate a 'conspiracy theory' on wiki seems a bit disingenuous. It'll all come out eventually an
by uncoder0 7y ago
It does not appear to be related. As a side note calling the US Spygate a 'conspiracy theory' on wiki seems a bit disingenuous. It'll all come out eventually and be interesting to see how history views those events... 'OCONUS lures', foreign intel collusion, information laundering through intel (push & pull) and all. It seems very fishy, looking forward to the release of the facts. From my rather deep research I'd put it more in the plausible but, unverified category rather than full blown 'false conspiracy theory'.
- equalunique 7y agoI agree that the article doesn't reflect the reality of the situation. One must understand that the Wikipedia acticle's content is controlled by gatekeeping-editors who collectively agree on what they want it to say. Trying to change the narrative there is an uphill, literally rigged battle. I am also suspicious that reporting on this new "spygate" story might be an attempt to muddy the SEO waters.
- akhilcacharya 7y agoIt's a subset of the "Deep State" conspiracy theory, so it deserves them moniker. I remember when we had a president that wasn't a conspiracy theorist.
- creddit 7y agoAny chance you can expound on “your rather deep research”? So far, my research, like Trump’s tweets, have surfaced no evidence.