3 ms·
And other big part was legalized abortion. http://freakonomics.com/podcast/abortion/ http://freakonomics.com/podcast/abortion/
by Maximus9000 7y ago
And other big part was legalized abortion.
http://freakonomics.com/podcast/abortion/ http://freakonomics.com/podcast/abortion/
- bjourne 7y agoThe abortion theory is pretty much busted by now. You find the same crime-reduction pattern in European countries were abortion has been legal since the 1940s. You don't find subsequent crime increases in countries were abortion has been outlawed or access to it has been severely restricted.
- Maximus9000 7y agohmm, well I did listen to the above podcast which was recorded in 2019, and they revisited the abortion numbers and still thought it was very relevant. Do you have a link I can check out?
- bjourne 7y agoDonohue and Levitt have, as they say, "dug their heels in." But other researchers have tried and failed to find correlations between abortion and crime in other datasets. See f.e. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40071728?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents https://www.jstor.org/stable/40071728?seq=1#metadata_info_ta... and https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9401/e8f1a53aa4437beed139ec2b2f1741f44be3.pdf https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9401/e8f1a53aa4437beed139ec... Other researchers have focused on Donohue and Levitt's study itself and found methodological flaws. See https://www.nber.org/papers/w15098.pdf https://www.nber.org/papers/w15098.pdf and https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=866864 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=866864: "We revisit that paper, showing that the actual implementation of DL's statistical test in their paper differed from what was described. (Specifically, controls for state-year effects were left out of their regression model.) We show that when DL's key test is run as described and augmented with state-level population data, evidence for higher per capita criminal propensities among the youths who would have developed, had they not been aborted as fetuses, vanishes."
- Mathnerd314 7y agoThis paper uses differing dates of abortion legalization in Western Europe to find a strong effect of abortion reducing crime: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144818814000568 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01448... Those are dates in the 60's though, so not sure what European countries you're referring to. Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_reproductive_rights_legislation#1910s_to_1960s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_reproductive_right... the only country with on-demand abortion before 1950s was the Soviet Union for a brief period.
- bjourne 7y agoThe hypothesis is that abortion causes lower crime rates. Thus, a few or even a single counter-example is enough to invalidate the hypothesis. Data points that confirm the hypothesis doesn't add much new information since these results too could be caused by the same confounding variables that caused the first result (correlation doesn't imply causation). Yes, it was the Soviet union and other Eastern European countries that had liberal abortion laws which they then reversed to spur population growth that I referred to. If Donohue and Levitt's theory were correct, the generation born during the years abortion was legal would be less criminal than following generations.
- Mathnerd314 7y agoAnd do you have a source analyzing that? All I can find are some off-the-cuff remarks from 2001 with no data analysis.
- K0SM0S 7y agoJust FYI, I don't know about others but France legalized abortion in 1975 after what is told as a rather uphill battle lead by Simone Veil [1]. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_Veil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_Veil