3 ms·
> No, that would just be regular motion -- and QM would be no really different from throwing a cannonball (for example) and running the ballistic equations. Th
by BoiledCabbage 7y ago
> No, that would just be regular motion -- and QM would be no really different from throwing a cannonball (for example) and running the ballistic equations.
This is not true. Under the DeBroglie-Bohm interpretation of QM an object exists at a single place at a time, what is fuzzy is our knowledge of where it is. And this interpretation holds up to all of the double slit and interference behaviors we expect from QM.
- coldtea 7y ago>This is not true. Under the DeBroglie-Bohm interpretation of QM an object exists at a single place at a time, what is fuzzy is our knowledge of where it is. And this interpretation holds up to all of the double slit and interference behaviors we expect from QM. Under the DeBroglie-Bohm, yes. But the above description (which is also what I criticized in the prior comment): (a) an object exists at a single place at a time, (b) what is fuzzy is our knowledge of where it is Are not enough to get to DeBroglie-Bohm interpretation though -- it misses it's critical element: the pilot wave / guide.