3 ms·
Well, the motivation as identified in the article is aerodynamics. Side mirrors mess with that. So they would argue that side mirrors aren't "working fine", o
by peeters 7y ago
Well, the motivation as identified in the article is aerodynamics. Side mirrors mess with that. So they would argue that side mirrors aren't "working fine", or rather there's an advantage to removing them.
- m463 7y agoYour argument seems to put aerodynamics and vision at equal priority, but I don't agree with that. But I've been proven wrong. I thought people wouldn't buy a car without a dashboard in their line of sight and the model 3 is a top seller in spite of that.
- peeters 7y agoI'm not making an argument. I was saying that they don't agree with your premise, that mirrors are working fine.