> If you believe that Australian newspaper is also a "politics website" that is a "source of misinformation" then justify that. I don't want to jump in on the

> If you believe that Australian newspaper is also a "politics website" that is a "source of misinformation" then justify that. I don't want to jump in on the rest of your conversation but I saw this and thought I could chime in. The Australian is our only national broadsheet with a long history of fairly good reporting, good commentary from all sides of politics, but a definite conservative editorial slant. Unfortunately over the last few years its reporting in general and environmental reporting in particular, have veered away from good quality conservative aligned journalism towards the more typical Newscorp produce. On reef issues in particular Graham Lloyd is well known for cherry picking sources even if they have little expertise in the area or have already had their views discredited in the scientific community. https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/muddying-the-waters-on-the-great-barrier-reef/9972936 https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/muddying-the-wate... https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/great-barrier-grief-missing-from-the-australian/9972734 https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/great-barrier-gri... So to answer that statement, the Australian is definitely a source of misinformation on environmental issues and if its not a politics website, it has a strong political agenda.