> It's definitely not science Why not? It's proposing an underlying model, which in turn provides a framework for investgation as well as a way reasoning abou

> It's definitely not science Why not? It's proposing an underlying model, which in turn provides a framework for investgation as well as a way reasoning about things in the absence of harder data as. Sounds like science to me. What would you propose as a more scientific approach to estimating the number of communicating civilizations in the galaxy?