2 ms·

Stackoverflow answer show 100% performance decrease for a benchmarck with memcached.

• yjftsjthsd-h 7y ago
  Are you referring to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21889053/what-is-the-runtime-performance-cost-of-a-docker-container/29735476#29735476 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21889053/what-is-the-run... ? If so: I'm hesitant to put too much weight on an answer from 2015, based on running different builds in/out of docker, sitting right under another answer that shows basically no performance difference on anything except network (and with the ability to fix that by using host networking if you care). And even that post doesn't show "100% performance decrease", it shows a 41% drop (184857.06 / 312836.64 = 0.59). If that's not the SO post you mean, then please point me to the right one.
  • The_rationalist 7y ago
    That's the one I meant, thanks for your effort! The thing is: I'm not saying that docker has a big performance penalty, I'm saying that I don't know and that it's sad there's no real evidence on stackoverflow.
    • yjftsjthsd-h 7y ago
      Oh, I see. Yeah, that's unfortunate.