> The meaning seems pretty clear. It's like the GPL but distribution now also encompasses offering the software over the network in the form of a service. Agre

> The meaning seems pretty clear. It's like the GPL but distribution now also encompasses offering the software over the network in the form of a service. Agree. > What's less clear is what defines the boundaries between AGPL-licensed software and the rest of your stuff making up whatever you're offering. This isn't always 100% clear with the GPL either but the GPL meaning of distribution is pretty tightly tied to traditional Unix methods of combining code which are mostly unambiguous. Agree again. See my point? I don't say AGPL is bad only that it has a tendency to confuse developers in all directions.