3 ms·
You said "... but morality is ..." and just agreed with me, I think? Ultimately, I think it's a case-by-case on this type of thing. Btw, I find it very intere
by Quekid5 7y ago
You said "... but morality is ..." and just agreed with me, I think?
Ultimately, I think it's a case-by-case on this type of thing.
Btw, I find it very interesting that e.g. most EU courts will consider "tampered-with" evidence, but obviously take into account that it may have been tampered with and so accord it much less weight than "pristine" evidence. Whereas US courts will[0] absolutely throw out anything that's shown to be even mildly "tampered-with". I don't know what the right answer is, but it's an interesting question to ponder.
[0] Maybe this is wrong; I'm not a US-ian, so I may not have perfect insight into the court system :|.
- yaseer 7y agoI agreed. I just wanted to take it a stage further and emphasise the definition of 'wrong' is always complex in moral discussions.
- Quekid5 7y agoNoice :). I apologize for the somewhat aggressive/sarcastic tone at the start of my reply. Reading it back, it sounded so much "more" (in every way) than I intended.