3 ms·
This rings true, and the reason you will see some charters with minorities is that it is classist as well as racist. When deciding to send our child to public
by lemmsjid 7y ago
This rings true, and the reason you will see some charters with minorities is that it is classist as well as racist.
When deciding to send our child to public school, suddenly people around us were feeding us with this really cloudy liberal version of classism/racism. Which was basically that: "While we love underprivileged people, if your child is in a school full of underprivileged people, they might not thrive as well as if they were in fancy charter school X." Prefaced by a few sentences started by the wonderful pseudo-scientific canard, "studies have shown...!"
I have come to the belief that this country is ultimately not culturally committed to the notion that equal opportunity comes from education, and that every child should actually get equal opportunity. Even for the most 'liberal' people, it's wrapped up in so much existential fear around their child succeeding in an increasingly competitive rat race that requires absolute educational and developmental perfection until they get into a prestigious university. The recent celebrity college admission scandals are a symbol of this kind of thing, especially given that the families involved were already wealthy enough to support their children into adulthood.
I hope I am wrong.
- the_af 7y agoWow. It's not just your country, it's like you're talking about mine! In my country the same conversations take place, only it's "public school" vs "private schools". And public schools used to be top notch here, but thanks to decades of lowering budgets and teacher salaries they are now in critical condition :( This of course reinforces this notion that they are ok for underprivileged people, but if you have the money you should send your kids to a private school :(