> So he is a terrible human being for having pro-Brexit opinions? Not solely, no. He's terrible for being a spokesman for Brexit as good for Britain and Britis

> So he is a terrible human being for having pro-Brexit opinions? Not solely, no. He's terrible for being a spokesman for Brexit as good for Britain and British business, and then moving his British business to Singapore: i.e. for saying one thing and then doing the opposite. Hypocrisy. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/23/james-dyson-brexiteer-elite-brexit-rees-mogg https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/23/james-... He gets a lot of personal benefit from the EU, as well: https://www.fwi.co.uk/news/dyson-defends-his-1-6m-farm-subsidy-receipts https://www.fwi.co.uk/news/dyson-defends-his-1-6m-farm-subsi... https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/sir-james-dyson-s-farm-benefited-eu-subsidies-despite-backing-brexit-1-5866243 https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/sir-james-dyson... If you believe that the exodus of businesses, of which this is an example, has "nothing to do with Brexit", then I have a second-hand car plant to sell you.