The article uses a bunch of examples like cryopreservation and whiskey to erroneously state that biological age doesn't matter, completely forgetting that A: th

The article uses a bunch of examples like cryopreservation and whiskey to erroneously state that biological age doesn't matter, completely forgetting that A: that technology doesn't exist, and B: humans don't stop aging. Besides, don't people refer to whiskey as "aged 21 years" not "21 years old"? The man with the lawsuit doesn't even have a legitimate argument for changing his age, why can't he just lie on dating apps like everyone else?