> Yet another symptom of C++'s terrible user library ergonomics. I disagree. What stops you from picking one of the myriad of networking libraries? POCO, Boos

> Yet another symptom of C++'s terrible user library ergonomics. I disagree. What stops you from picking one of the myriad of networking libraries? POCO, Boost, libcurl, etc... Is it too hard for you to include one of the many de-facto standard libraries? Would it help if you adopt one of the many package managers for C++ libraries such as Conan? What exactly are you missing from your library ergonomics? And more to the point? Has the collective software development community learned nothing from the collosal mistake of forcing Al sorts of components into a standard library to be set in stone? Has the C and Java standard libraries taught you nothing?