3 ms·
The whole point of moving things to the browser was to remove any lockin advantages a specific platform might have. That is the reason Flash gets so much hate f
by spiffworks 16y ago
The whole point of moving things to the browser was to remove any lockin advantages a specific platform might have. That is the reason Flash gets so much hate from anybody who doesn't use Windows. Going back to OS-specific codecs would limit codec choice to what the OS vendor considers kosher. And lest we forget, its far harder to switch operating systems than it is to switch browsers. If you don't like Chrome, Firefox or Opera, nobody's stopping you from using IE or Safari.
> bundling codecs is being limited to what Google and Mozilla say is ok for them
What you are suggesting merely takes the power out of the hands of browser vendors and puts it in the hands of the os vendors. I trust Mozilla, and to a far lesser extent Google, more than I ever will trust Microsoft.
- GHFigs 16y agoGoing back to OS-specific codecs would limit codec choice to what the OS vendor considers kosher. Not true. e.g.: http://xiph.org/dshow/ http://xiph.org/dshow/ http://xiph.org/quicktime/ http://xiph.org/quicktime/ Why am I not free to do this with h.264 in "open" browsers?