I agree. I just don't get why: 1) Everyone assumes the good will outweigh the bad. (And why proof of humans doing one task better than AI is somehow also taken

I agree. I just don't get why: 1) Everyone assumes the good will outweigh the bad. (And why proof of humans doing one task better than AI is somehow also taken as self-evident proof that the AI will be better at everything else.) 2) No one assumes that we, as humans, will ever be able to improve our driving skills in way that can keep up with AI advances. Someone could invent a magic driving pill. Which is crazy. I just don't assume that it's any crazier than a near-perfect driving AI.