If by "best" you mean "most pointless" and if by "FAQ" you mean "uninformed rant". There's no real substance, it adds nothing to the debate, uses unjustified h

If by "best" you mean "most pointless" and if by "FAQ" you mean "uninformed rant". There's no real substance, it adds nothing to the debate, uses unjustified hyperbole ("CSS is flawed"), doesn't show the added flexibility of CSS, overstates cross-browser CSS incompatably horribly and abuses half-truths to twist the argument (unless magically you think my low-resolution phone is going to love your table-based layout). CSS scales in big sites, reduces load times and lets you do many, many clever things you couldn't do in raw HTML and makes life easier, especially when combined with a CMS. And that site is ugly and it's not because of tables. The site would look better without any graphics of styling at all. Hating Photoshop is not a good reason for having a site that's horrendously ugly. But I do agree content is king. Just as well that he has something worthwhile that makes people look past the godawfully bad site.