3 ms·
no, actually it's not :). I take it you don't like his tweets very much then. Or your view on how to use twitter differs significantly. Is that the case?
by LeonW 16y ago
no, actually it's not :). I take it you don't like his tweets very much then. Or your view on how to use twitter differs significantly. Is that the case?
- catshirt 16y agoSorry Leon, I misunderstood. My confusion stemmed from how it seemed that you were inspecting the titles- not tweets. But for all intents and purposes for your article I realize that's the same.
- LeonW 16y agono worries, getting peoples thoughts is always the best thing that can happen. :) Well, I think the people behind @GuyKawasaki are putting a lot of effort into both the posts and tweets (which are def interlinked I guess) and are sweating over every word they are writing. To me the content is quite useful most of the time - def retweetable all of the time. Dismissing it as "spammy" is a bit - well harsh. If one feels it is quite a big load he tweets, that's understandable, but spam looks different to my eyes. So that's why I believe his headlines are overly brilliant. :). Is this maybe more understandable?
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]