4 ms·
The rate is misleading since there's a back and forth with the judge before final submission. eg the judge will look it over and says that there's no specific
by wmil 7y ago
The rate is misleading since there's a back and forth with the judge before final submission.
eg the judge will look it over and says that there's no specific crime listed like the law requires, two weeks later there are money laundering allegations also listed, the judge approves it without asking where the new allegations came from.
- ceejayoz 7y agoThe same article states: > Fewer than 200 requests had to be modified before being accepted, almost all of them in 2003 and 2004.