3 ms·

How is donating $500k in response to making $200k from their sale a relevant response? Is this their way of bribing people to quiet down? Seems twisted.

by SLIB53 7y ago

deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
Beltiras 7y ago
As corporate responses go this one is pretty activist. Compare and contrast with other weasely statements made by other CEOs lately.
deleted 7y ago
[deleted]
ocdtrekkie 7y ago
Presumably the $500,000 in donation specifically to help victims of controversial ICE practices will have significantly more beneficial impact than the $200,000 in GitHub services they'll provide will do harm. And arguably, it means they're taking a loss on this particular business to both uphold their commitment to their customers and uphold their values regarding immigration practices. Given the level of complexity of the issue, I'd say it's at least... not a bad attempt at walking a very narrow line here.
sremani 7y ago
One thing Businesses like consistency - if GitHub goes after ICE, then why not IRS or FBI or any other private organization - every Org is one controversy away from to be deemed persona non grata. Its not about ICE with GitHub, what they are doing is worth mulitple millions in future earnings. So good move CEO - the question is how much the WOKE nation is going to eat this PR CAKE.
- sascha_sl 7y ago
  Thanks for explaining why corporate responsibility and the notion of voting with your wallet in capitalism are bullshit. Corporations care about being consistent with the status quo. Nothing more, nothing less. Now get these PR clowns out of my pride marches.
chipperyman573 7y ago
I think it's a way of demonstrating that they don't care about the money in this situation and the decision was guided entirely by what they felt was right. Donating $500k instead of 200 was a bit weird, but I guess it's going to a cause that fights the primary department of ICE that people tend to object to, so it might be a way to demonstrate that they truly believe what they're saying
- alibaba_x 7y ago
  I thought the same thing as well and am confused as to why you're getting downvoted.
  - CompanionCuuube 7y ago
    I have run into anti-principle based sentiment in the comments sections recently.
skybrian 7y ago
Some people will inevitably accuse them of doing it for the money, and this is their way of demonstrating that it's not that. There are policy issues. Which, indirectly, do involve money, but that's true of everything.

How is donating $500k in response to making $200k from their sale a relevant response? Is this their way of bribing people to quiet down? Seems twisted.

by SLIB53 7y ago

How is donating $500k in response to making $200k from their sale a relevant response? Is this their way of bribing people to quiet down? Seems twisted.

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]

Beltiras 7y ago

As corporate responses go this one is pretty activist. Compare and contrast with other weasely statements made by other CEOs lately.

deleted 7y ago

[deleted]

ocdtrekkie 7y ago

Presumably the $500,000 in donation specifically to help victims of controversial ICE practices will have significantly more beneficial impact than the $200,000 in GitHub services they'll provide will do harm. And arguably, it means they're taking a loss on this particular business to both uphold their commitment to their customers and uphold their values regarding immigration practices. Given the level of complexity of the issue, I'd say it's at least... not a bad attempt at walking a very narrow line here.

sremani 7y ago

One thing Businesses like consistency - if GitHub goes after ICE, then why not IRS or FBI or any other private organization - every Org is one controversy away from to be deemed persona non grata. Its not about ICE with GitHub, what they are doing is worth mulitple millions in future earnings. So good move CEO - the question is how much the WOKE nation is going to eat this PR CAKE.

sascha_sl 7y ago
Thanks for explaining why corporate responsibility and the notion of voting with your wallet in capitalism are bullshit. Corporations care about being consistent with the status quo. Nothing more, nothing less. Now get these PR clowns out of my pride marches.

chipperyman573 7y ago

I think it's a way of demonstrating that they don't care about the money in this situation and the decision was guided entirely by what they felt was right. Donating $500k instead of 200 was a bit weird, but I guess it's going to a cause that fights the primary department of ICE that people tend to object to, so it might be a way to demonstrate that they truly believe what they're saying

alibaba_x 7y ago
I thought the same thing as well and am confused as to why you're getting downvoted.
- CompanionCuuube 7y ago
  I have run into anti-principle based sentiment in the comments sections recently.

skybrian 7y ago

Some people will inevitably accuse them of doing it for the money, and this is their way of demonstrating that it's not that. There are policy issues. Which, indirectly, do involve money, but that's true of everything.