2 ms·
The more I dive into the history of various technologies (and even professions), the more it becomes apparent that militaries are responsible for a vast proport
by beerandt 7y ago
The more I dive into the history of various technologies (and even professions), the more it becomes apparent that militaries are responsible for a vast proportion of historical advancements, even in the most unexpected areas.
Edit: Also responsible for a vast supply of historical datasets.
Edit 2: IMHO, the most fascinating is all the tie-ins between artillery, spycraft, astronomy, aerospace/rockets, geodosy & cartography (and invention of the chronograph), tidal monitoring & weather keeping, nuclear weapons, gps, and probably a dozen more topics I'm forgetting off the top of my head.
Individually, each of these is a mammoth of a topic on its own. But the interplay in their development (as influenced by big-picture military strategy) is just mind-boggling to me. It is by far, the most interesting, persistent, and deep rabbit-hole I've encountered.
(Hint: Ballistic missiles are essentially long range artillery. Hint 2: They require gravitational variation to be taken into account for targeting.)
- rsj_hn 7y agoI think this is absolutely correct. Huge advances are driven by war, for obvious reasons -- survival is at stake. John Napier discovered the logarithm due to his work on artillery. A lot of Archimedes's innovations were driven by the desire to build weapons. The demand for accurate clocks was driven by the Navy, giving rise to many innovations. And of course in the 20th Century, integrated circuit design was driven by a desire to build computers that could be embedded in ballistic missiles and withstand large amounts of heat. Fairchild semiconductors' first big contracts were primarily for defense and NASA.