"Particularly not if it's been proven that you have a financial interest in muddying the waters." The other side has, arguably, beneficial (if not financial) i

"Particularly not if it's been proven that you have a financial interest in muddying the waters." The other side has, arguably, beneficial (if not financial) interest in promoting their climate views. Just because on the surface it seems noble, doesn't mean it isn't being abused by those that wish to take advantage of it. And this is particularly pertinent if the "pro-climate" side has a very distinct pro-government-expansion component nested within it, if not downright socialism.