3 ms·
The Razakars were armed and highly organised muslim milita supporting the nizam in Hyderabad. They went on a killing spree against the natives who though in num
by naruvimama 7y ago
The Razakars were armed and highly organised muslim milita supporting the nizam in Hyderabad. They went on a killing spree against the natives who though in numerical majority were unorganized villages. The report even if it is true and is not politically motivated still pales in comparison to the systemic and continues cleansing of 10s of millions that continue to this day in Pakistan.
As for the European generosity they take a tiny fraction compared to India. They insist on integration, which would be politically incorrect in India. Some countries like France and Denmark have already banned the hijab.
Religion is a tiny fraction of a person's identity, but if it comes to eclipse everything then your loyalty to your society that is pluralistic is suspect.
They knew all along that they were illegal migrants. Considering that some of them have only been forced into islam in not more than three generations ago, it is possible that they might convert back to their native roots and claim asylum.
- heraclius 7y agoOn the Razakars etc.: the report is unimpeachable—Nehru commissioned the report but it besmirches his claim to have unified India relatively peacefully. And yes I acknowledged above that Pak is worse—10s of millions is probably a high figure for ethnic cleansing at the moment but I can’t really defend what’s happening in Balochistan. Europe: because things have been so poorly managed reasonably high proportions (~1%) have been accepted. Also I don’t see why integration is needed in India given very great cultural proximity. As for knowing they were illegal migrants, some don’t—the need for papers only became apparent recently and some can’t find them. This is an unavoidable problem.