4 ms·
It's such a nice standard, I just wish it had better support on E-readers (looking at you Kindle).
by foo_in_bar 7y ago
It's such a nice standard, I just wish it had better support on E-readers (looking at you Kindle).
- robin_reala 7y agoWell, it’s only Kindle that insists on a proprietary format. Everyone else does ePub 2 fine (ePub 3 support is spotty).
- Mediterraneo10 7y agoKindles can read .mobi files, which is a pretty open format. Calibre can easily convert EPUBs to .mobi (or to the similar .azw3 format) for reading on Kindle. While Amazon has introduced recently a new format with advanced typographic features that is highly proprietary (.kfx), uptake of it among publishers has been slow.
- robin_reala 7y agoMobipocket has been dead for the last couple of years and I can’t find a spec anyway. The Library of Congress describe it as a “proprietary, partially documented, binary format for ebooks”[1] which doesn’t really meet “open” by my definition. As for KFX, that’s 100% proprietary, yes. Amazon in the US at least has sewn up the ebook market such that they have no interest at least in implementing open standards. The best thing to do in these situations is to vote with your wallet. [1] https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000472.shtml https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd0004...
- karanbhangui 7y agoI love my Kobo Clara HD for its native epub support. I prefer the hardware and software over my Kindle Paperwhite too, tho I use the latter when epubs are’t available. I tried the whole Calibre conversion thing for a while, but just find it better/easier to have two ereaders.